Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos5,925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Cohen results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 1,054 hits. Analysis detected 10,476 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,700 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (6,039 of 6,135 authors). This David Cohen is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
David Cohen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠2%David Cohen (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 23,700
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751001.6% percentile
1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles23.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos