Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vladimir Isachenkov results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Begging the Question , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 385 hits . Analysis detected 1,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,961 of 6,628 authors). This Vladimir Isachenkov is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Vladimir Isachenkov
Author details
Total words: 4,776
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Tu Quoque: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst