Author summary
83% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,057 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Catenacci results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 1,913 hits . Analysis detected 13,996 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,671 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,326 of 6,359 authors). This Thomas Catenacci is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Thomas Catenacci
Author details
Total words: 9,671
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 19.8% 19.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.3% 6.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.6%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 19.8%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst