Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These OMAR ALBAM results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 221 hits . Analysis detected 1,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,632 of 6,235 authors). This OMAR ALBAM is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. OMAR ALBAM
Author details
Total words: 1,852
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.8% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst