Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susannah George results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,234 hits . Analysis detected 8,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,860 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,192 of 6,294 authors). This Susannah George is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Susannah George
Author details
Total words: 4,860
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.1% percentile 4.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 24.1% 24.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.4% 6.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 25.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 24.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.4%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst