Author summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Hendrix results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 774 hits. Analysis detected 4,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,542 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (922 of 6,359 authors). This Steve Hendrix is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Steve Hendrix
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
86%Steve Hendrix (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,542
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.5% percentile
5.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 25.0%25.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 29.0%29.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.9%6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.3%7.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 30.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 29.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 11.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate