Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stefano Pitrelli results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 1,098 hits . Analysis detected 5,162 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,568 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,285 of 6,315 authors). This Stefano Pitrelli is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Stefano Pitrelli
Author details
Total words: 3,568
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.7% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.8% 30.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.1% 14.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.2% 11.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 30.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 11.2%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst