Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Taylor results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 1,024 hits . Analysis detected 4,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,742 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,499 of 6,341 authors). This Adam Taylor is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Adam Taylor
Author details
Total words: 3,742
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 27.4% 27.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 27.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst