Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 894 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Faiola results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 1,049 hits . Analysis detected 4,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,340 of 6,561 authors). This Anthony Faiola is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Anthony Faiola
Author details
Total words: 3,576
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.6% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 29.3% 29.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.7% 10.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 29.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst