Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Craw results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.5% saturation with 787 hits . Analysis detected 4,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,096 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 90% (685 of 6,359 authors). This Victoria Craw is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group. Victoria Craw
Author details
Total words: 2,096
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.2% percentile 6.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.0% 23.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 34.8% 34.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 15.9% 15.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 37.5% 37.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.9% 7.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 37.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 34.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 15.9%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst