Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzan Haidamous results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 825 faulty-reasoning hits from 392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15% and a BS Rank of 98% (160 of 6,274 authors). This Suzan Haidamous is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Suzan Haidamous
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
98%Suzan Haidamous (selected)16%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 392
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510097.5% percentile
15.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles392 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 19.4%19.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 17.1%17.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 42.4%42.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 32.9%32.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 19.4%19.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Author 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 19.4%19.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.7%9.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 42.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 32.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 19.4%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Author 19.4%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 19.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 17.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Circular Reasoning: Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos