Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctions And Embargoes results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,578 hits . Analysis detected 9,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,524 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (8,543 of 15,753 topics). This Sanctions And Embargoes is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Sanctions And Embargoes
Topic details
Total words: 9,524
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst