Keyword summary
58% 121 analyzed articles/videos 62,913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Netanyahu results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 38,753 hits . Analysis detected 315,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 334,037 analyzed words across 120 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,559 of 37,533 keywords). This Benjamin Netanyahu is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group. Benjamin Netanyahu
Keyword details
Total words: 334,037
Article count: 120
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.9% percentile 1.8% BS Score120 analyzed articles334K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst