Author summary
99%1 analyzed article/video809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joshua Klein results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 639 hits. Analysis detected 3,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,427 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,064 of 6,359 authors). This Joshua Klein is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Joshua Klein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
84%Joshua Klein (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,427
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510083.3% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.8%4.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 5.7%5.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.0%5.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 6.5%6.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 26.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos