Topic summary
50% 22 analyzed articles/videos 5,069 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Agreements results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 4,235 hits . Analysis detected 30,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,700 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,615 of 15,359 topics). This International Agreements is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. International Agreements
Topic details
Total words: 34,700
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score22 analyzed articles34.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst