Topic summary
62%27 analyzed articles/videos8,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Weapons results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 6,910 hits. Analysis detected 53,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 68,906 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (14,615 of 15,689 topics). This Nuclear Weapons is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score27 analyzed articles68.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Trump Approves Nuclear Deal With Saudi Arabia33%
Foreign Policy29%By Alexandra Sharp22%7/22/2026, 9:25:30 PM
Trump approves nuclear agreement that may allow Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium, 2 AP sources say65%
AP News53%By Aamer Madhani69% Michelle L. Price47% Jon Gambrell53%7/22/2026, 1:42:01 AM
Missile test marks new phase in expansion of China’s nuclear-armed submarine force73%
The Japan Times66%By Jesse Johnson75%7/7/2026, 7:40:00 AM
US-Iran negotiations: What’s the latest?21%
Al Jazeera58%By Al Jazeera Staff55%7/1/2026, 8:38:25 AM
The Strait of Hormuz is Iran’s Nuclear Weapon57%
Washington Monthly51%By Jonathan Alter70%6/29/2026, 9:00:00 AM
Framing…74%Optimis…74%Ambigui…74%Biased …74%
JD Vance holds peace talks with Iran as Trump threatens strikes over Hormuz83%
The Washington Post92%By Mary Ilyushina0% Sammy Westfall0% Susannah George0%6/21/2026, 10:20:10 AM
Trump faces new hurdles after deal: Iran’s leverage, Israel’s attacks, MAGA’s backlash97%
The Washington Post92%By Michael Birnbaum0%6/21/2026, 9:00:00 AM
What the Trump-Iran agreement says about Lebanon, Hormuz and uranium9%
Al Jazeera58%By Sarah Shamim0%6/18/2026, 11:50:22 AM
Why Trump’s Iran deal is little more than a shopping list of capitulations59%
The Independent67%By Bel Trew0%6/17/2026, 11:43:43 PM
Trump defends his Iran deal, criticizes longtime ally Israel as G-7 ends49%
The Washington Post92%By Dan Diamond0% Natalie Allison0% Cleve R. Wootson Jr.0% Michael Birnbaum0%6/17/2026, 8:32:02 PM