Topic summary
62% 27 analyzed articles/videos 8,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Weapons results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 6,910 hits . Analysis detected 53,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 68,906 analyzed words across 27 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (14,615 of 15,689 topics). This Nuclear Weapons is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group. Nuclear Weapons
Topic details
Total words: 68,906
Article count: 27
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score27 analyzed articles68.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst