Author summary
15% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,790 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Bebernes results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 903 hits . Analysis detected 6,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,642 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,227 of 6,244 authors). This Mike Bebernes is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Mike Bebernes
Author details
Total words: 10,642
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst