Author summary
30% 1 analyzed article/video 1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JACQUES BILLEAUD results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 424 hits . Analysis detected 1,956 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,529 of 6,172 authors). This JACQUES BILLEAUD is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. JACQUES BILLEAUD
Author details
Total words: 4,125
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst