Author summary
38%2 analyzed articles/videos1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JONATHAN J. COOPER results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 710 hits. Analysis detected 3,701 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,525 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,739 of 6,246 authors). This JONATHAN J. COOPER is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
JONATHAN J. COOPER
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
25%JONATHAN J. COOPER (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,525
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510024.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate