Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarrett Renshaw results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 767 hits. Analysis detected 4,578 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,468 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,944 of 6,162 authors). This Jarrett Renshaw is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Jarrett Renshaw
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
69%Jarrett Renshaw (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,468
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510068.5% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 6.0%6.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate