Author summary
⁠59%5 analyzed articles/videos1,572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Hayward results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,503 hits. Analysis detected 10,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,949 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (2,754 of 6,628 authors). This John Hayward is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
John Hayward
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠59%John Hayward (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,949
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510058.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.5%4.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos