Breitbart81%

Trump to Attend White House Correspondents’ Dinner After April Assassination Attempt 10%

By Nick Gilbertson74%

7/24/2026, 6:24:29 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Status Quo Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 357 faulty-reasoning hits from 454 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.8% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,773 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON—President Donald Trump is set to attend the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on Friday night, months after the event was derailed by a would-be assassin in April. 
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that Trump will deliver a “vicious” but “unifying” speech. 
The president noted in April that he was “all set to really rip it” in his speech before the dinner was cut short. 
“The president’s speech will be a combination of unifying yet vicious, and serious yet hilarious, all at the same time, if you can imagine that,” Leavitt told NBC News. 
“One thing I can assure you, it will be entertaining.” 
During the April dinner at the Washington Hilton, the gunman, whom authorities have identified as Cole Tomas Allen, 31, attempted to sprint past magnetometers reportedly carrying a shotgun, a handgun, and several knives in an alleged effort to reach the ballroom. 
The suspect was ultimately apprehended after an exchange of gunfire with the Secret Service, with one agent being struck in a bulletproof vest. 
Allen allegedly wrote a manifesto in which he detailed an intention to target officials in the Trump administration. 
He also allegedly attended a No King’s protest, was a shooting range regular, and was part of a group called the Wide Awakes. 
Friday’s affair is not being held at the Hilton, where the correspondents’ dinner has taken place for over 50 years. 
Instead, it will be at the Waldorf Astoria. 
White House Correspondents’ Association President Weijia Jiang told C-SPAN the program is essentially the same as April, though the Waldorf is a smaller venue and there are “enhanced security measures.” 
“Honestly, the program is very much the same as April. 
What will be different is the size. 
It’s a much more intimate gathering,” Jinag said. 
“The Washington Hilton is a massive ballroom that holds 3000 people. 
The Waldorf Astoria holds 700 people… so that is the first main difference people will see.” 
“There are enhanced security measures. 
We have a private security firm that has worked closely with Secret Service. 
There are new measures that every single dinner guest has to take,” she said. 
Jiang said that guests will have unique QR codes and photo ID to gain entry through ticketing. 
“As you both know, you didn’t have to register to come to the dinner. 
You didn’t have to provide your name or anything,” she said of April’s event. 
“And now every guest has to register, and they’ll get a unique QR code and have to present that with a government-issued photo ID just to get through the ticketing, and then they’ll have to go through layers of security to enter the ballroom,” she added. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.2%Nick Gilbertson: 3.0%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias2.2%This article: 3.5%Nick Gilbertson: 1.3%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias3.5%This article: 5.1%Nick Gilbertson: 3.5%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic5.1%This article: 1.8%Nick Gilbertson: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 1.4%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 9.8%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.7%Nick Gilbertson: 8.1%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect13.7%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.5%Nick Gilbertson: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Nick Gilbertson: 4.7%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias2.2%This article: 1.1%Nick Gilbertson: 1.3%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 5.5%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 6.8%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 2.6%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 5.3%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 2.1%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 3.8%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 2.4%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 6.1%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.7%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.9%Nick Gilbertson: 3.2%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority2.9%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 3.1%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 1.7%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 1.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.1%Nick Gilbertson: 8.9%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization5.1%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 1.0%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.4%Nick Gilbertson: 12.7%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion6.4%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 3.9%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 3.8%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.1%Nick Gilbertson: 2.4%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof10.1%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.5%Nick Gilbertson: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division3.5%This article: 2.2%Nick Gilbertson: 1.0%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal2.2%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.9%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.4%Nick Gilbertson: 2.8%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote6.4%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 1.8%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.1%Nick Gilbertson: 3.6%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice5.1%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 3.1%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 3.1%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Gilbertson: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

454 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers62%attributed speech171writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 16 words • 100.0% coverageTrump • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 29 words • 100.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 7 words • 100.0% coverageJiang • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWeijia Jiang • 46 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Karoline Leavitt

100%flagged-word coverage
55 attributed words19% of attributed speech25% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Unattributed Quote+52.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Karoline Leavitt: 52.7%52.7%Biased Writer Voice+29.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Karoline Leavitt: 29.1%29.1%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.