Keyword summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,655 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington-Dc results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 6,002 hits . Analysis detected 31,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,319 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (18,455 of 34,608 keywords). This Washington-Dc is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Washington-Dc
Keyword details
Total words: 23,319
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles23.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 24.7% 24.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.7% 25.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst