Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spencer Neale results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 2,225 hits . Analysis detected 11,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,940 of 6,316 authors). This Spencer Neale is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Spencer Neale
Author details
Total words: 7,960
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 27.9% 27.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.5% 8.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.3% 13.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst