Author summary
63% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samuel Chamberlain results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,103 hits . Analysis detected 11,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,022 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,122 of 6,497 authors). This Samuel Chamberlain is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Samuel Chamberlain
Author details
Total words: 12,022
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst