Author summary
75%6 analyzed articles/videos3,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan King results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 2,160 hits. Analysis detected 17,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,708 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,188 of 6,244 authors). This Ryan King is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Ryan King
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
49%Ryan King (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,708
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

49% percentile
025507510049.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.7%14.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate