Author summary
75% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan King results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 2,160 hits . Analysis detected 17,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,708 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,188 of 6,244 authors). This Ryan King is better (less manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Ryan King
Author details
Total words: 14,708
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 7.6% 7.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst