Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marisa Schultz results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 832 hits . Analysis detected 6,322 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,610 of 6,628 authors). This Marisa Schultz is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Marisa Schultz
Author details
Total words: 6,648
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 10.8% 10.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst