Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victor Nava results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Overconfidence Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,444 hits . Analysis detected 14,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,820 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,914 of 6,244 authors). This Victor Nava is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Victor Nava
Author details
Total words: 14,820
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst