Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Goodin results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,807 hits . Analysis detected 15,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,460 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,750 of 6,360 authors). This Emily Goodin is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Emily Goodin
Author details
Total words: 12,460
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.6% 10.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.5%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst