Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Propper results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 789 hits . Analysis detected 5,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,124 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,347 of 6,425 authors). This David Propper is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. David Propper
Author details
Total words: 4,124
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.5% 13.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.8% 12.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst