Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caitlin Doornbos results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 1,557 hits . Analysis detected 9,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,380 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,781 of 6,364 authors). This Caitlin Doornbos is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Caitlin Doornbos
Author details
Total words: 7,380
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 7.8% 7.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst