Speaker summary
66% 38 analyzed articles/videos 2,780.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karoline Leavitt results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 616.382 hits . Analysis detected 6,938.525 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,780.667 analyzed words across 38 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,361 of 26,730 speakers). This Karoline Leavitt is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Karoline Leavitt
Speaker details
Total words: 2,780.667
Article count: 38
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score38 analyzed videos2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst