Author summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gordon Lubold results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,586 of 6,192 authors). This Gordon Lubold is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group. Gordon Lubold
Author details
Total words: 2,940
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% No True Scotsman: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst