Keyword summary
43%3 analyzed articles/videos1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Secret Service results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 963 hits. Analysis detected 4,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,860 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,726 of 37,536 keywords). This U S Secret Service is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
U S Secret Service
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%U S Secret Service (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 21.9%21.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate