Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Mosack (OAN Staff) results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.9% saturation with 3,874 hits . Analysis detected 18,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,476 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,416 of 6,628 authors). This Katherine Mosack (OAN Staff) is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Katherine Mosack (OAN Staff)
Author details
Total words: 9,476
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.6% percentile 4.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 40.9% 40.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.7% 26.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 16.9% 16.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 40.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 16.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst