Keyword summary
â 0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Correspondentsâ Dinner results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 1,147 hits . Analysis detected 14,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,261 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 36% (22,679 of 34,925 keywords). This White House Correspondentsâ Dinner is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. White House Correspondentsâ Dinner
Keyword details
Total words: 14,261
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst