Author summary
91% 13 analyzed articles/videos 9,847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natasha Lennard results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 17,128 hits . Analysis detected 97,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,292 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,871 of 6,138 authors). This Natasha Lennard is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Natasha Lennard
Author details
Total words: 53,292
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.5% percentile 3.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles53.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.1% 32.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 22.5% 22.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 22.5%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst