How Trump’s America Produces Normie Assassins 46%

By Natasha Lennard91%

4/27/2026, 8:35:32 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.8% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 2,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 899 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.2% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,197 of 20,448 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.80% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 25: U.S. 
President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House on April 25, 2026 in Washington, DC. 
President Trump is making a statement after the cancelation of the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner after a possible shooting.( 
Photo by Andrew Leyden/Getty Images) 
Donald Trump speaks during a press conference after a shooting at the White House Correspondents Dinner on April 25, 2026, in Washington, D.C. 
Photo: Andrew Leyden/Getty Images 
As more and more information is published about the suspect in the latest possible assassination attempt on President Donald Trump, commentators are in a typical scramble to assign an ideology or clear politics to the 31-year-old man. 
There’s not a lot to glean so far about Cole Tomas Allen of Torrance, California. 
A since-deleted Bluesky account reportedly linked to the suspect included run-of-the-mill criticisms of the Trump administration; he lists himself as a self-employed video game designer and part-time teacher. 
According to reports, he studied mechanical engineering and computer science, was part of a Christian fellowship, and also a nerdy-sounding club for students to have battles with foam toys. 
He reportedly donated $25 to ActBlue in 2024 earmarked for Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign. 
He was a registered voter with “no party preference” in California. 
From the evidence available so far, the suspect seems to be a normie. 
Trump’s regime can give rise to a normie suspected assassin because the brutality and violence it has so wholly normalized, and the impunity it has reveled in, is deranging. 
In a piece of writing Allen left behind before the White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting, derangement peeks through between clear reasons for targeting administration officials. 
He includes chirpy asides (“stay in school kids”), and bounces between formal and casual registers throughout. 
He lists as his targets “Administration officials (not including Mr. 
Patel),” without explaining why FBI Director Kash Patel is named for exemption. 
His final message is more a summary explanation than a manifesto. 
But in his more lucid moments, Allen cites concerns that people from across the political spectrum share about Trump and his administration. 
“I am a citizen of the United States of America. 
What my representatives do reflects on me,” Allen wrote in the missive covered by multiple outlets. 
“I’m no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes,” he added, without specifically naming the president. 
Republicans have, of course, been swift to blame Democrats for the shooting. 
Trump, who earlier this month threatened to annihilate the “whole civilization” of Iran and revels in his regime’s anti-immigrant violence, told CBS News on Sunday that he thinks the “hate speech of the Democrats  is very dangerous.” 
The president described the suspect’s message as “anti-Christian,” though Allen identifies with Christian faith in his writing. 
“Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. 
I’m not the person raped in a detention camp. 
I’m not the fisherman executed without trial. 
I’m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration,” Allen wrote. 
“Turning the other cheek when *someone else* is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor’s crimes.” 
The reasons Allen cites for his fury are not conspiratorial or weighted with ideology. 
He points to crimes and acts of extreme violence that the administration has either committed or been complicit in, while seeming to fear no constraints or consequences. 
The suspect appears to be no devotee of the Democratic Party and no committed leftist. 
Republicans haven’t even bothered to wheel out the antifa boogeyman; nothing points to any such identification. 
Allen expressed anger about the Trump administration’s crimes, its acts of oppression, alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein’s pedophile ring, and impunity. 
Such anger is not the preserve of the left, or even of liberals. 
Allen reportedly targeted Trump and members of his administration, whereas the three previous attempted attacks on Trump’s life appeared to aim only at the president. 
There is little uniting the suspects involved, except that they were all men in a country awash with guns and threadbare mental health care and support resources at a time of normalized deadly violence and U.S.-backed genocide. 
Thomas Matthew Crooks, 20, whose bullet scraped Trump’s ear at a Pennsylvania rally in 2024, was a registered Republican but not active in right-wing organizing. 
Ryan Wesley Routh, 58, convicted of plotting to kill Trump at his West Palm Springs resort in Florida in 2024, espoused eclectic anti-establishment politics, having voted for Trump in 2016 before becoming an ardent critic; he was also an obsessive supporter of Ukraine. 
Austin Tucker Martin, 21, was fatally shot by Secret Service agents after crashing his vehicle into the security perimeter of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in February of this year. 
His loved ones said he was never interested in politics. 
There is no consistency in the varied and messy worldviews of Trump’s would-be assassins. 
If media commentators and politicians want to make banal points about the rise in political violence, there is only one consistently violent ideology to trace throughout these cases: the fascistic ideology of far-right Republicans and their leader. 
After expressing gratitude for his family, friends, colleagues, and church, Allen ended his message, “I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.9%Natasha Lennard: 9.7%The Intercept: 5.2%Confirmation Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Natasha Lennard: 3.4%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 14.2%Natasha Lennard: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic14.2%This article: 2.8%Natasha Lennard: 0.7%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.8%This article: 7.2%Natasha Lennard: 1.6%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias7.2%This article: 1.9%Natasha Lennard: 15.3%The Intercept: 9.3%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.7%The Intercept: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.1%Natasha Lennard: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Natasha Lennard: 0.5%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 3.2%Natasha Lennard: 4.4%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 36.5%Natasha Lennard: 16.3%The Intercept: 12.5%Negativity Bias36.5%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.2%The Intercept: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Natasha Lennard: 1.7%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error4.3%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Natasha Lennard: 2.6%The Intercept: 1.8%In-Group Bias1.3%This article: 4.1%Natasha Lennard: 1.5%The Intercept: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.1%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Natasha Lennard: 1.1%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Natasha Lennard: 5.0%The Intercept: 2.5%Ad Hominem5.6%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.8%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.1%Natasha Lennard: 4.2%The Intercept: 3.5%Appeal to Authority1.1%This article: 7.6%Natasha Lennard: 3.8%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma7.6%This article: 7.3%Natasha Lennard: 4.9%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope7.3%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 20.0%Natasha Lennard: 10.0%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization20.0%This article: 1.8%Natasha Lennard: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring1.8%This article: 1.3%Natasha Lennard: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 14.7%Natasha Lennard: 12.1%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion14.7%This article: 2.2%Natasha Lennard: 4.9%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question2.2%This article: 10.3%Natasha Lennard: 2.6%The Intercept: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.3%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.3%Natasha Lennard: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.8%Burden of Proof1.3%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.1%Natasha Lennard: 1.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division4.1%This article: 9.1%Natasha Lennard: 2.0%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal9.1%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Natasha Lennard: 1.5%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Natasha Lennard: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground2.4%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 21.7%Natasha Lennard: 2.4%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote21.7%This article: 14.5%Natasha Lennard: 2.6%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection14.5%This article: 40.8%Natasha Lennard: 32.1%The Intercept: 10.7%Biased Writer Voice40.8%This article: 12.2%Natasha Lennard: 6.3%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination12.2%This article: 25.3%Natasha Lennard: 22.5%The Intercept: 6.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias25.3%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Natasha Lennard: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

899 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers21%attributed speech714writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageCole Tomas Allen • 16 words • 100.0% coverageCole Tomas Allen • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageCole Tomas Allen • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageThomas Matthew Crooks • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRyan Wesley Routh • 43 words • 0.0% coverageAustin Tucker Martin • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageCole Tomas Allen • 24 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Cole Tomas Allen

100%flagged-word coverage
89 attributed words48% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+43.7 ptsWriter: 11.3%Cole Tomas Allen: 55.1%55.1%Biased Writer Voice-51.4 ptsWriter: 51.4%Cole Tomas Allen: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-31.8 ptsWriter: 31.8%Cole Tomas Allen: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+14.9 ptsWriter: 12.0%Cole Tomas Allen: 27.0%27.0%Unattributed Quote-7.1 ptsWriter: 25.1%Cole Tomas Allen: 18.0%18.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.