Author summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,623 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julianne McShane results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 4,627 hits . Analysis detected 32,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,925 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,539 of 6,628 authors). This Julianne McShane is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group. Julianne McShane
Author details
Total words: 31,925
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles31.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst