Author summary
0% 32 analyzed articles/videos 17,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Mosack results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 9,139 hits . Analysis detected 80,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,132 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (2,935 of 6,135 authors). This Katherine Mosack is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Katherine Mosack
Author details
Total words: 56,132
Article count: 32
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score32 analyzed articles56.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.3% 16.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.0% 15.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst