Trump: ‘An agreement has largely been negotiated’ with Iran, and ‘the Strait of Hormuz will be opened’ 73%

By Katherine Mosack0%

5/23/2026, 2:26:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Bandwagon, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 578 faulty-reasoning hits from 563 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of 73% (6,012 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump held a conference call with leaders of several Middle Eastern nations to discuss a possible peace agreement between the United States and Iran. 
On Saturday, the president announced on Truth Social from the Oval Office that he had a “very good call” with Saudi Arabian President Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud, United Arab Emirates (UAE) President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani, Qatari Minister Ali al-Thawadi, Pakistani Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir Ahmed Shah, Turkey President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, Jordan King Abdullah II and Bahrainian King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa. 
He said the call with the host of Gulf leaders concerned “the Islamic Republic of Iran, and all things related to a Memorandum of Understanding pertaining to PEACE.” 
“An Agreement has been largely negotiated, subject to finalization between the United States of America, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the various other Countries, as listed,” President Trump stated. 
“Separately, I had a call with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, of Israel, which, likewise, went very well,” he added. 
“Final aspects and details of the Deal are currently being discussed, and will be announced shortly. 
In addition to many other elements of the Agreement, the Strait of Hormuz will be opened.” 
As U.S. and Iranian negotiators reviewed a Pakistan-mediated draft memorandum of understanding (MOU), Trump previously said he was a “solid 50/50” between resuming military action in Iran and agreeing to a permanent deal to end the conflict that began in late February. 
“Either we reach a good deal, or I’ll blow them to a thousand hells,” he told Axios. 
Ahead of the meeting, Trump also said there would likely be an update on the negotiations on Sunday. 
Pakistan said Saturday there had been “encouraging progress toward a final understanding.” 
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei described the proposal as a “framework agreement.” 
“We want this to include the main issues required for ending the imposed war and other issues of essential importance to us,” Baghaei said, according to Iranian state TV. 
“Then, over a reasonable time span, between 30 to 60 days, details are discussed and ultimately a final agreement is reached.” 
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to reporters while in India on Saturday, also signaled potential movement in the negotiation process. 
“There’s been some progress made,” Rubio said, adding that “there may be news later today. 
There may not be. 
I hope there will be, but I’m not sure yet.” 
Rubio reiterated the Trump administration’s requirement that Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon, saying that efforts were underway in Washington to address its stockpiles of highly enriched uranium. 
“Even as I speak to you now, there’s some work being done,” Rubio added. 
Trump notably missed his son, Donald Trump Jr.’s wedding celebration on Saturday, due to “a thing called Iran.” 
Vice President JD Vance also had an unscheduled visit to the White House at the time of the meeting. 
Video footage of his motorcade rushing down a rain-soaked freeway circulated online on Saturday. 
This is a breaking story. 
Check back for updates. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.9%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.5%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Katherine Mosack: 3.7%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias10.7%This article: 13.7%Katherine Mosack: 16.3%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect13.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 22.7%Katherine Mosack: 4.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias22.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 15.0%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.6%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.9%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.1%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 19.5%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect19.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.3%Katherine Mosack: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.0%Katherine Mosack: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma3.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.8%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 16.2%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon16.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 11.3%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 2.8%Katherine Mosack: 3.2%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection3.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 6.3%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.4%Katherine Mosack: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.4%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.3%

563 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers43%attributed speech319writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 91 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coveragePakistan • 12 words • 0.0% coverageEsmail Baghaei • 13 words • 0.0% coverageEsmail Baghaei • 29 words • 0.0% coverageEsmail Baghaei • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
126 attributed words52% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Quote-first Misdirection+13.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 13.5%13.5%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.6 ptsWriter: 0.6%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.