Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Negotiations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 1,928 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,689 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,742 of 16,562 topics). This Iran Nuclear Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Iran Nuclear Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 1,689
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.6%21.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.3%11.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.0%8.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos