Topic summary
0%10 analyzed articles/videos5,577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle East Diplomacy results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 3,847 hits. Analysis detected 28,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,199 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (10,025 of 16,562 topics). This Middle East Diplomacy is better (less manipulative) than 60.50% of the peer group.
Middle East Diplomacy

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510039.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate