Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doina Chiacu results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 224 hits . Analysis detected 2,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,400 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (1,998 of 6,170 authors). This Doina Chiacu is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Doina Chiacu
Author details
Total words: 2,400
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.6% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.9% 6.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst