Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Humeyra Pamuk results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 2,058 hits . Analysis detected 10,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,188 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,561 of 6,196 authors). This Humeyra Pamuk is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Humeyra Pamuk
Author details
Total words: 7,188
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 4.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.9% 17.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.6% 28.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.0% 0.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 28.6%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 24.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst