Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parisa Hafezi results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,105 hits . Analysis detected 5,743 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,384 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,495 of 6,628 authors). This Parisa Hafezi is worse (more manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group. Parisa Hafezi
Author details
Total words: 5,384
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.4% percentile 3.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst