Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Mills results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 777 hits . Analysis detected 2,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,612 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,464 of 6,629 authors). This Andrew Mills is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Andrew Mills
Author details
Total words: 4,612
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.6% Red Herring: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst