Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gram Slattery results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 413 hits . Analysis detected 1,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,776 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,873 of 6,628 authors). This Gram Slattery is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Gram Slattery
Author details
Total words: 1,776
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.8% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.1% 12.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst