Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Faris results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 49.1% saturation with 2,845 hits . Analysis detected 11,362 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (878 of 6,628 authors). This David Faris is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. David Faris
Author details
Total words: 5,800
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.8% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 49.0% 49.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.0% 26.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 49.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.0%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 20.1%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst