Texas: 26-year-old man arrested over bomb and death threats targeting Erika Kirk 32%

By Katherine Mosack0%

5/28/2026, 5:56:03 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 652 faulty-reasoning hits from 402 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.3% and a BS Rank of 32% (13,933 of 20,371 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the article peer group.

A 26-year-old man in Texas was arrested after allegedly making online threats to kill Turning Point USA (TPUSA) CEO Erika Kirk. 
Jacob Wenske, 26, was arrested Wednesday night in San Antonio, according to a San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) arrest affidavit. 
Wenske was charged with two third-degree felony counts of making a terroristic threat with the intent to impair public service, create public fear of serious bodily injury and influence government conduct, legal filings revealed. 
On April 12th, San Antonio Express-News, a local paper, promoted a TPUSA Women’s Leadership Summit set for June 5th through June 7th at the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter, featuring Kirk as a keynote speaker. 
“I know exactly where to bomb,” Wenske allegedly replied to the post, prompting an investigation. 
In a separate post, he also added, “I can’t wait to be the valet for her escort,” according to authorities. 
“Death to Erika Kirk and every single speaker there!! 
America will live on without those scum on this earth. 
Every Christian nationalist shall perish in the bombing that will take place at every single Turning Point rally and event,” Wenske allegedly wrote in an email. 
TPUSA spokesperson Matt Shupe later emphasized that the conservative organization takes threats such as these very seriously. 
“The safety of our attendees, speakers, and staff is always our top priority. 
All TPUSA events include enhanced, multi-layered security measures enforced by both private security and local police,” Shupe told Fox News. 
“We refuse to let threats silence us. 
We look forward to a successful and inspiring gathering June 5–7 in San Antonio for 2,500+ ladies attending the Women’s Leadership Summit!” 
Mrs. 
Kirk took over TPUSA after the public assassination of her husband, the organization’s co-founder, Charlie Kirk, in September last year. 
However, since stepping into the role, she has faced ongoing threats. 
In April, she even canceled an appearance at a TPUSA event at the University of Georgia due to what organizers called at the time “very serious threats.” 
Wenske had his Central Magistration Hearing on Thursday. 
If convicted, he faces two to 10 years in state prison and a fine of up to $10,000. 
Court records indicate his bond was set at a combined $120,000. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
What do YOU think? 
Click here to jump to the comments! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.7%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.9%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Katherine Mosack: 3.5%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic15.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 5.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.7%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 17.4%Katherine Mosack: 16.3%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect17.4%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.7%Katherine Mosack: 4.0%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 32.3%Katherine Mosack: 15.0%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias32.3%This article: 3.2%Katherine Mosack: 3.6%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Katherine Mosack: 4.9%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.1%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 4.6%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.2%Katherine Mosack: 5.9%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority9.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 5.8%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 8.5%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring8.5%This article: 2.7%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon2.7%This article: 12.4%Katherine Mosack: 11.3%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion12.4%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.2%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.7%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.5%Katherine Mosack: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof4.5%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.7%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.7%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.6%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.7%Katherine Mosack: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote3.7%This article: 6.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection6.0%This article: 3.2%Katherine Mosack: 6.3%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice3.2%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 1.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katherine Mosack: 3.3%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Katherine Mosack: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.5%

402 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers35%attributed speech263writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Wenske • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Wenske • 9 words • 100.0% coverageJacob Wenske • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJacob Wenske • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Shupe • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Shupe • 13 words • 100.0% coverageMatt Shupe • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Shupe • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Shupe • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jacob Wenske

100%flagged-word coverage
60 attributed words43% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Quote-first Misdirection+40.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jacob Wenske: 40.0%40.0%Unattributed Quote+25.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jacob Wenske: 25.0%25.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.4 ptsWriter: 8.4%Jacob Wenske: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.